Global Derivatives: $1.5 Quadrillion Time Bomb

1-derivatives - financial time bomb When investing becomes gambling, bad endings follow. The next credit crunch could make 2008-09 look mild by comparison. Bank of International Settlements(BIS) data show around $700 trillion in global derivatives. Along with credit default swaps and other exotic instruments, the total notional derivatives value is about $1.5 quadrillion – about 20% more than in 2008, beyond what anyone can conceive, let alone control if unexpected turmoil strikes. The late Bob Chapman predicted it. So does Paul Craig Roberts. It could “destroy Western civilization,” he believes. Financial deregulation turned Wall Street into a casino with no rules except unrestrained making money. Catastrophic failure awaits. It’s just a matter of time. Ellen Brown calls the “derivatives casino…a last-ditch attempt to prop up a private pyramid scheme” – slowly crumbling under its own weight. For years, Warren Buffett called derivatives “financial time bombs” – for economies and ordinary people. Unless collateralized or guaranteed, their worth depends on the creditworthiness of counter-parties. Earnings on derivatives are “wildly overstated,” Buffett explains – because they’re “based on estimates whose inaccuracy may not be exposed for many years.” When corporate bosses ask financial executives how profits look in any quarter, they, in turn, ask how much do you want, then manipulate things to oblige when told. Since 2008, too-big-to-fail banks consolidated to much greater size than ever. They’re financial and political powerhouses controlling world economies to their own advantage.

Microaggression, Macro-Crazy

1-microaggression Early this year, the University of California’s president, Janet Napolitano, asked all deans and department chairs in the university’s ten campuses to undergo training in overcoming their “implicit biases” toward women and minorities. The department heads also needed training, according to the UC president, in how to avoid committing microaggressions, those acts of alleged racism that are invisible to the naked eye. A more insulting and mindless exercise would be hard to imagine. But Napolitano’s seminar possesses a larger significance: it demolishes any remaining hope that college administrators possess a firmer grip on reality than the narcissistic students over whom they preside.

Peter Beinart’s Fantasy

1-Peter Beinart Does Beinart really believe the media complex that gives the War Party a guaranteed platform suffers from amnesia? I hardly think so. And as for the historians, surely they’ll be a bit more perceptive than Beinart gives them credit for. The answer to Beinart’s conundrum is that there’s no difference whatsoever between the media and “the political-intellectual complex that made the Iraq War possible.” As writers like Glenn Greenwald have demonstrated again and again (and again) the “mainstream” media functions as the regime’s Praetorian Guard. As Greenwald put it in this tweet: “US Govt officials today told me X, and ordered me to conceal their identity as I uncritically parrot it. I obeyed. The End. Hire me, NYT!”

The Eroding Character of the American People

1-Dees - 1950s The only conclusion that one can come to is that the American people have failed. We have failed Justice. We have failed Mercy. We have failed the US Constitution. We have failed Truth. We have failed Democracy and representative government. We have failed ourselves and humanity. We have failed the confidence that our Founding Fathers put in us. We have failed God. If we ever had the character that we are told we had, we have obviously lost it. Little, if anything, remains of the “American character.” The failure of the American character has had tremendous and disastrous consequences for ourselves and for the world. At home Americans have a police state in which all Constitutional protections have vanished. Abroad, Iraq and Libya, two formerly prosperous countries, have been destroyed. Libya no longer exists as a country. One million dead Iraqis, four million displaced abroad, hundreds of thousands of orphans and birth defects from the American ordnance, and continuing ongoing violence from factions fighting over the remains. These facts are incontestable. Yet the United States Government claims to have brought “freedom and democracy” to Iraq. “Mission accomplished,” declared one of the mass murderers of the 21st century, George W. Bush. The question is: how can the US government make such an obviously false outrageous claim without being shouted down by the rest of the world and by its own population? Is the answer that good character has disappeared from the world? Or is the rest of the world too afraid to protest?

Obama’s Diversity Police State and Government Mandated Racism

US President Barack Obama takes off his jacket as he speaks about the Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare, at Taylor Stratton Elementary School in Nashville, Tennessee, July 1, 2015. AFP PHOTO / SAUL LOEBSAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images Obama has brought racism to a whole new level in our government. It’s breathtaking in scope and breadth. He is solidifying his legacy before leaving office with the unprecedented gathering of information on all of us and how we live to be used in racial databases. Not only does the government already have such databases on police departments, they have created monster ones for almost every area of our lives to be used to forward “racial and economic justice” as we have never seen before as a nation. Enforced diversity is racism. Obama is already using the databases against institutions to penalize them and it will get much worse. In fact, I wouldn’t put it past Obama to have other databases floating around out there having to do with demographics on gun ownership, religion and political affiliations. But what has just come to light as fact is that he’s got people tallying everything to do with race and mining data on American’s health, home loans, credit cards, places of work, neighborhoods and how children are disciplined in public schools. All of this is to show how ‘hateful’ and ‘racist’ we are as a nation. It creates racism out of thin air and shows it where it never existed. It takes all responsibility from those of color and places it on institutions. It blames repression on an evil white national structure. It’s meant to show how discriminated against minorities are in comparison to whites in every sector of American society. Not only will this discriminate against whites, it will be a bonanza for attorneys who will make billions off of petty law suits using these skewed statistics as testimony against individuals and businesses in court. As the New York Post points out, these databases will be weaponized against banks that don’t make enough prime loans to minorities; schools that suspend too many blacks; cities that don’t offer enough Section 8 and other low-income housing for minorities; and employers who turn down African-Americans for jobs due to criminal backgrounds.

Land of the Free Watch: Obama To Issue Executive Order Targeting 4.2 Million Retirees With Massive Gun Ban

1-Second Amendment Just when you thought they’ve tried every trick up their sleeves to disarm American citizens, the creative minds within the Obama administration have come up with a new idea. Because seizing firearms from veterans has been so successful, they figure they can give it a shot on a much more massive scale, and they’ll be using a Presidential Executive Order to make it happen. This time the President will be targeting 4.2 million Americans who are receiving Social Security benefits for disarmament.

Supreme Court Says: R.I.P. States’ Rights

1-dont tread on me I for one cannot believe that what we have seen in the last six, much less the last fifty, years gives any confidence that the federal government is capable of giving the American people the freedom, “the freedom to govern themselves,” that they ought to be living under. Capable of giving them ever-mounting entitlements, and binding their lives with regulations (the Federal Code book is now 175,496 pages, 117 times bigger than the Bible), and saddling them with an impossible-to-pay $18 billion dollar debt, and intruding unrestricted into private communications, and providing various teats on which they can suckle, yes. But freedom? No. That is why I believe that the death of states’ rights is really a clarion call for states to defy the federal government and assert their rights independently of Washington and its minions. I care not how it be done, but the two classic methods long ago outlined by Jefferson and Madison in the Kentucky and Virginia resolutions of 1798 are nullification and secession, and I think those gentlemen would see the wisdom, and the necessity, of bringing them back now. Already a majority of the country (54 per cent) feels that states should ignore federal programs they don’t agree with (Rasmussen Poll, 2015) and a quarter (23.9 per cent) are in favor of secession (Reuters/Ipsos poll 2014). That is fruitful ground. I care not how it be done, but I would say that unless it is done, starting now and working gradually but unreservedly, this country would not be worth living in. I do not believe that most people want to live under a regime where five unelected liberals regulate their most intimate social institutions, a fumbling Congress cannot keep the NSA from invading our privacy, imperial presidents can waste trillions of dollars and millions of lives on pointless wars, middle-class income has withered for thirty-five years while the obscenely rich get obscenely richer, individuals increasingly feel that they have no voice or influence in the matters that effect their lives. And they shouldn’t have to.

Why Does the ‘War on Terror’ Serve Western Policy?

1-ISIS - fake beheading The central banks, the Fortune 100 and their shareholders love cultural Marxism and command and control, socialist economic models because it is the quickest way to consolidate wealth and transfer the actually valuable assets to the controlling oligarchy. In such a system, the opposition will inevitably all be titled “terrorists,” as the appellation is already being extended beyond radical Islamists. And after it extends beyond the average person, the conditioning will be so strong that any thoughts, words, actions or potential-pre-crime actions will also follow under the elastic notion of “terror.” Terrorism is thus a social weapon, not of indigenous, individual “actors” and lone wolves, but stage managed dupes, patsies and tools of an international oligarchical cartel, as Orwell demonstrated in 1984 with the fictional villain of Immanuel Goldstein.

Most Americans Would Like to See a Humane and Sensible Foreign Policy

1-war is a racket - Butler quote I have recently found that many conservatives and even libertarians now tend to shy away from serious debate on national security issues. They have become particularly nervous about discussing Israel’s role in the formulation of U.S. foreign policy for reasons that I can only guess at. CPAC had only one foreign policy panel in its most recent iteration and the various libertarian gatherings have become comfortable with anodyne anti-war bumper stickers as a substitute for any serious probing of the issues underlying America’s downward spiral.

Confederate Flag Sales Up ‘500 Times’

1-Confederate flag Stores are reporting that sales of Confederate Rebel flags have shot up, with some claiming that they are selling 500 times more than what they were before the corporate media driven flap over the symbol. As government and perpetually offended Americans have continued to call for banning anything remotely connected to the flag, retailers have noted that it is having the exact opposite effect, and making it exponentially MORE popular. “It’s 500 times what it was, without exaggerating,” says Dave Nippert of Lou’s Wholesale. “We could’ve done well marketing nothing but Rebel stuff.” “People don’t like being told what they can and can’t have,” Nippert added, explaining that he stocked up on Confederate merchandise, knowing full well that an increase in demand would occur. Another seller in Iowa tells NBC reporters that sales of the iconic flag have gone through the roof.

Greece: Sound and Fury Signifying Much

1-Greece vs banksters All of Europe, and insouciant Americans and Canadians as well, are put on notice by Syriza’s surrender to the agents of the One Percent. The message from the collapse of Syriza is that the social welfare system throughout the West will be dismantled. The Greek prime minister Alexis Tsipras has agreed to the One Percent’s looting of the Greek people of the advances in social welfare that the Greeks achieved in the post-World War II 20th century. Pensions and health care for the elderly are on the way out. The One Percent needs the money. The protected Greek islands, ports, water companies, airports, the entire panoply of national patrimony, is to be sold to the One Percent. At bargain prices, of course, but the subsequent water bills will not be bargains.

Video: Cop Face-Slams Handcuffed Teen Girl Into Concrete Floor, Knocking Teeth Out

1-teen girl slammed by cop Sickening video has emerged of yet another police officer violently slamming a handcuffed suspect face-first into the ground. The footage shows Colorado Springs officer Tyler Walker ramming 18-year-old Alexis Acker into the concrete floor while the girl was already restrained.

California’s Mandatory Vaccine Bill: An Issue of Freedom, Accountability, and Safety

1-Dees - vaccination We at the American Eagle Party believe the American people deserve to be educated, informed, and free to choose what is best for themselves and their families. Having these beliefs, we are very critical of the new mandatory vaccine bill (SB277) Governor Jerry Brown signed into law in California on June 30, 2015. This new mandatory vaccine law is set to go into effect on July 1, 2016. Let’s look at the details of this law.

Background on the Law

“Last week, Gov. Jerry Brown (D) signed SB 277, by state Senator. Richard Pan (D-Sacramento) and Ben Allen (D-Redondo Beach), which only allows children who have received vaccinations for certain diseases — such as measles and whooping cough — to be admitted to schools in the state.

The legislation allows exemptions for medical reasons. In addition, the measure was amended to:

• Allow unvaccinated children to enroll in private home-schooling programs that serve multiple families, rather than programs that serve just one family;

• Permit such children to participate in independent study projects that are overseen by school districts but do not include classroom time;

• Remove a provision that would have required schools to inform parents of immunization rates; and

• Allow physicians to consider family histories when determining medical exemptions.”



The more we educate ourselves, as we must, the more uneasy we become about blindly following laws that are established through lobbying, secrecy, and dishonesty. Thanks to many vaccine awareness groups, people sharing their personal stories, and easily accessible information, the general public is more informed about vaccines than every before. We have access to information that can help us make educated decisions about vaccinating ourselves and our children. Unfortunately, this new law has taken that choice away from California parents and it very well could be a harbinger of what is to come throughout the entire United States.

Let’s take a journey through the vaccine debate and peer into the real issues we are facing.

Vaccine Ingredients

Let’s start with the long list of toxic ingredients that are in vaccines and how they can affect our body. Vaccine ingredients include aluminum, formaldehyde, animal DNA, thimerosal (a mercury-containing preservative that is added to vials of vaccine that contain more than one dose to prevent contamination and growth of potentially harmful bacteria), monosodium glutamate, Antibiotics, and many words most can’t even pronounce let alone understand what they actually are and how they affect us. The following link is a list of ingredients that are being injected into our bodies in high volume through vaccines:

“To see what mercury does to neurons (brain cells), I highly recommend watching this video, from the University of Calgary, Faculty of Medicine (Shown Below). In the interest of informed consent, all parents should be made to watch this video before being allowed to give permission for their child to receive vaccines containing mercury.”


Vaccine Side Effects

There are many side effects which we are seeing more and more of due to higher quantities of vaccines being given in shorter spans of time. Children’s immune systems are being compromised and this leads to a long list of health problems. The biggest debate at the moment is whether vaccines are linked to autism. According to the CDC’s 2010 reort, 1 in 68 children have been diagnosed with autism. This has increased from 1 in 150 since 2002. 1 in 6 children have developmental disorders in the U.S.


An article published by Green Med Info titled “Attacking Ourselves: Top Doctors Reveal Vaccines Turn Our Immune System Against Us” doctors explain how our bodies are reacting to vaccines. I highly recommend reading it in it entirety.

There are powerful scientific studies linking the MMR vaccine to autism. Vaccine courts have paid out millions to families who have proven their children are autistic after receiving vaccines. The government, however, still refuses to admit vaccines cause autism therefore you won’t hear about this on main stream media.

There are many doctors now speaking out and linking autism to vaccines. This includes Dr. Bradstreet, a doctor and researcher who spoke out and testified about the dangers of vaccines. He officially found links to vaccines and autism and he was found dead last week under suspicious circumstances.

“Our children are among the most highly vaccinated children in the world, and they are among the most chronically ill and disabled,” explains NVIC in a powerful infographic outlining the current vaccine schedule. “Today, the Centers for Disease Control admits that 1 child in 6 in America is developmentally delayed. During the past quarter century, the number of children with learning disabilities, ADHD, asthma and diabetes has more than tripled … (and) the number of doses of vaccines that pediatricians give babies and children under age 6 has more than doubled…Interestingly, twice as many children today also suffer from chronic brain and immune system dysfunction compared to the number of children in the 1970s, when roughly half as many vaccines were administered to young children. And the overall percentage of brain-injured children in the 1940s was lower still, as only a few primary vaccines were administered to children at that time. The close connection between the rise in the number of vaccines on the vaccine schedule and the number of brain-injured and neurologically-impaired children, in other words, is difficult to deny, and represents a serious cause for concern”


Vaccines are being pushed into the public much faster now than ever before and in much higher quantities. Children are given 12 times more vaccines that they were given 30 years ago. 49 doses of vaccines are given to children by the age of 14 and 69 doses are given by the age of 18. View the current CDC’s vaccine schedule here:

“Anti-Vaccine Doctors”

The vaccine debate has been misconstrued to mean parents and doctors who are hesitant to give children high doses of vaccines are “anti-vaccines”. In fact, they are simply educated about what is happening to our children with the current vaccine schedule and their toxic ingredients.

“Most doctors blindly support the recommendations of the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics. Doctors are trained in administering vaccines, not in how they are made. There are some doctors that choose to do the research themselves in order to develop an informed opinion on the subject.” Dr Russel Baylock

Many of these doctors are using alternative vaccine schedules giving the body longer processing times before more injections.

“In 1980, I abandoned the recommended vaccine schedule. I received dozens and dozens of phone calls from moms and dads reporting that their child had received shots a couple of days ago and they were acting a little different. They couldn’t quite put their finger on it but their child was just not acting quite the same as before I gave the shots. They’d ask if this was okay…was it normal? Initially, as I was trained to do, I replied yes. After dozens and dozens and dozens of phone calls, I decided that I had better listen to these moms a lot more.

I stopped some vaccines. I delayed others.

No, I am not ‘anti-vaccination.’

I am aware of the public health implications of completely abandoning our current vaccine schedule, and I certainly don’t advocate that. What I really want is an honest discussion of the risks and benefits of each vaccine and combinations of vaccines for your child. Just your child. My experience is that many parents don’t have the opportunity to discuss these concepts and these details with their doctors.” Dr. Jay Gordon

“The following document is the American 1984 DHHS federal register, which listed final rules pertaining to the polio vaccination campaigns in USA after three decades of scandal and misinformation.

That priority has placed many lives in jeopardy as major problems with vaccination were and are overlooked by vaccine policy makers.

There are many problems with the science that underpins vaccine information. I’ve yet to meet a pediatrician who is informed enough to offer informed consent. Infant immunity has been misunderstood by immunologists, as the immunology literature admits to. Only recently have some important questions been answered about why infant immune systems don’t function like adult ones. There is good reason for the tolerance that an infant has, and the answer is not to interrupt the program with aluminum and vaccines to ramp it up. That is now known to have long term consequences.” Dr. Suzanne Humphries

“Dr. Wakefield is a gastroenterologist and researcher who followed the evidence where it lead him. In 1998, Wakefield, Prof. John Walker Smith, Dr. Simon Burch, and 10 other co-authors published a paper in the Lancet, a British Medical Journal, which showed a possible correlation between the MMR vaccine and resultant gastrointestinal dysfunction along with developmental delays and autism. Though the paper did not state a conclusive causal effect, it did state the need for further study into the possibility that the MMR shot was to blame. Wakefield went on to publicly bring attention to the possibility, criticizing the MMR shot and calling for separation of the three vaccines. In 1999, I proposed that the MMR-autism risk may, in part, be a function of age of exposure: the younger you get the vaccine the greater the risk. Why? Because, the younger you get measles, the greater the risk of an adverse outcome. This idea was shared with the CDC. They tested the hypothesis in children in the Atlanta Metro area and they found it to be true. Dr. Wakefield was accused of fraud, and subsequently lost his medical license. Dubbed the father of the anti-vaccine movement, Wakefield has been both revered and vilified, depending on which side of the argument uses his name. The bizarre thing is, he is not anti-vaccine. He is, however, a critic of the MMR vaccine and has publicly stated that the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines should be given separately.”

Doctors are threatened with losing their license if they share scientific data with the public that even suggests vaccines might not be safe. This is corruption at it’s finest in America!

The issue of forced vaccines is heating up to the point where the main stream media is going after anyone who speaks out or refuses to be bullied into vaccinating. Forbes magazine recently published an article asking that all medical doctors be on board with forced vaccines or they should lose their medical license. The article is written with a belittling tone towards anyone who chooses to exercise their right to freedom of choice. Of course we know that the main stream media is on the side of the government and lobbyist so it isn’t a shock that these types of articles are being written to intimate us. Here is a quote demonstrating the ruthless bullying tactics happening on the main stream media side of this debate:

“…doctors speaking out against vaccination in the midst of an ongoing outbreak should be investigated, warned, and censured. They should have their licenses suspended until undergoing 150 hours of continuing medical education on public health and infectious diseases (except that cardiologist–he should just lose his license).”-Forbes

The reality we face is that our government (bought by big pharm) has complete control of our doctors. The level of control over our health by big pharm in America is frightening. We must take back control of our health care in America if we plan to stop our sickness being someone’s profit source.


Secrecy, Dishonesty and Accountability

The vaccine dilemma is not necessarily as black and white as whether to vaccinate or not vaccinate. We have many valid questions and we deserve answers. Instead we are told to shut up and do as we are told by the government because they have determined themselves as our authority. Wait isn’t our government suppose to answer to the people? Isn’t our government accountable to the people? The real issues for us are accountability, safety and our freedom to choose. Why is it that the government goes to such great lengths to hide information from the public regarding the harmful effects of vaccines, protect themselves from any accountability and insist we inject ourselves and our children without question? Let’s look at exactly how the government has set up a firewall of protection around itself, big pharm and doctors.

“Many are not aware that in the US there is a federally operated vaccine injury compensation program (VICP) that Congress created under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. The US Court of Federal Claims in Washington DC handles contested vaccine injury and death cases in what has become known as “vaccine court”. The VICP is a “no-fault” alternative to the traditional civil court lawsuit and was established in 1986 after a string of high-profile lawsuits had slammed vaccine manufacturer. In 2014, there were 542 vaccine injury compensation claims filed in the VICP. Of the claims, 365 were compensated for a total of $202 million, with settlements ranging from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars.

What you’ll notice is that very few of these claims are publicized or disclosed to the public in any way. It is obvious that the government does not want to publicize the existence of the VICP because the more Americans learn that there are vaccine injuries and deaths – those that have been vetted and compensated in a court of law – the more they may start to question the safety and of vaccines. The federal VICP compensates vaccine victims not from a fund paid into by vaccine manufacturers, but through a federal trust fund that collects a 75-cent surcharge on every vaccine given (the combination MMR vaccine, for example, has a $2.25 fee tacked on to it because that shot contains three vaccines). So not only are drug companies making big profits from selling mandated vaccines to government and vaccine producers, they are also held legally blameless for both vaccine injuries and deaths and don’t have to pay a cent to those injured by their vaccines.”


This is an excellent explanation of how corrupt the vaccine world actually:

There is currently zero accountability from our government, doctors, and the pharmaceutical companies for the safety of vaccines. One attempt the people have made to rectify this is having doctors sign a form that holds them accountable if children experience health risks after vaccinations. But it seems we don’t have a right to do that either.

“I have yet to meet a Physician that will sign this form now downloaded by hundreds of parents. The reason they won’t sign is two-fold: First, they do not want to place themselves in a vulnerable position of being negligent by not providing informed consent; and second, many of them realize after their own extensive research that the risks are not worth the benefits when it comes to vaccination.

It’s been over a year since hundreds of parents have downloaded this form and there are still no reports of any signatures. Many physicians won’t even look at the form while they dismiss a parent’s anti-vaccination stance as ridiculous. The behavior is a clear indication of a very misinformed Physician who does not have his or her patient’s best interests at heart. They are not willing to inform their patients of the risks, only the benefits they feel are acceptable. They are not open-minded to any other side of the debate except their own biased view passed down through the medical system.

Then are those Physicians who have questioned the vaccination schedules and will pursue their own research. Many of them are now awakening themselves thanks to ongoing research and pressure from parents and even other colleagues to look at other perspectives besides their own indoctrination. If you are pressured by any Physician to vaccinate, please download and print this form (and send us a Physician signed copy if possible). Assertively state to your Doctor that it is the only way you will fully informed to consider vaccination, and that an analyses of the risks and benefits will better allow you evaluate the decision.

100% of Physicians have so far declined to sign this form.

Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety Form

The following form was adapted from Ken Anderson’s original.

Download PDF English

Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety”


Notice the names listed above associated with the passing of the new California vaccine law. Senator Richard Pan is a medical doctor. Unfortunately he represents the pharmaceutical companies and not the American people.

“Dr. Pan is a pediatrician. He represents the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Medical Association, and the lobbyists who are pulling his strings and lining his pockets on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry, including vaccine-manufacturers. He does not represent the people of California, who elected him.

A recent article in the Sacramento Bee documents the $2 Million dollars paid to California lawmakers before the debate on SB277. Richard Pan topped the list, taking the most amount of money. He is, quite simply, BOUGHT.”


“Leading pharmaceutical companies also spent nearly $3 million more during the 2013-2014 legislative session lobbying the Legislature, the governor, the state pharmacists’ board and other agencies, according to state filings.”


“We call on California State Senator, Dr. Richard Pan to resign from his position due to his vested interests in profiting from Merck, GlaxoSmithKline and literally dozens of pharmaceutical companies, and the conflict of interest this causes.” (

Does this sound like a conflict of interest? Until our health is not longer big business how can we trust the medical community at all? We must get lobbyists out of our government.

Mainstream media follows the money trail:

Here is a great documentary on the conflict of interest between the vaccine industry and money.

Educate Yourself

Many doctors, scientists and parents are helping to educate us on the truth about vaccines. Here are a list of great video’s and documentaries created to help educate us and bring about greater awareness of the real issues we are facing with vaccines today.

Taking Action

“A day after Brown signed the law, former Assembly member and gubernatorial candidate Tim Donnelly (R-Twin Peaks) filed a referendum on the measure with the California Attorney General’s office (Adler, “KXJZ News,” Capital Public Radio, 7/1).

According to KPCC’s “KPCC News,” Donnelly has 90 days from when Brown signed the legislation to circulate and file petitions, as well as collect more than 365,000 signatures to get the referendum on the 2016 ballot (Plevin, “KPCC News,” KPCC, 7/1).

Donnelly said, “This referendum is not about vaccinations; it is about defending the fundamental freedom of a parent to make an informed decision for their children without being unduly penalized by a government that believes it knows best” (Richardson, Washington Times, 7/2).

Donnelly’s proposed referendum marked the first formal challenge to the law, but others are expected to follow, according to “KPCC News.”

Christina Hildebrand, founder of A Voice for Choice, said the organization will seek to overturn the law through a separate ballot referendum. Hildebrand said the group also will file a lawsuit alleging that the law violates children’s right to education (“KPCC News,” KPCC, 7/1).

Meanwhile, other opponents of the law have organized a group of attorneys to develop a legal challenge to SB 277, Reuters reports.

According to Melissa Floyd, a spokesperson for the California Coalition for Health Choice, the lawyers are working to obtain an injunction against the law on the argument that it violates the right to education. Floyd called the law “discriminatory,” adding, “The California Legislature just created a brand new group of second-class citizens, innocent healthy children who will permanently be barred from schools and day care because they haven’t received all doses of the vaccines on the schedule” (Bernstein, Reuters, 7/1).” Source:–vaccine-law-take-action

Here is a petition gaining momentum in California:–mandatory-vaccinations

Another petition to repeal immunity for drug companies:

Letter to the residents of California

“What has happened in California as a result of Richard Pan’s push for SB277? What has happened is that with every hearing, every testimony, every step closer to what happened today, more people woke up. More people became enlightened about what is happening to our children. More people became concerned about the government over-reach and the abusive tactics being employed to take away parental rights. People got involved. They stopped looking at each other as “the enemy” and they started working together to stand against a common abuser.

California is awake.

Californians who have been fighting SB277 are not just going to start lining up at pediatricians’ offices to have their children vaccinated according to The CDC’s schedule, just because Richard Pan and Governor Brown say so.

Those parents and activists in California are not going to back down.

There are already multiple discussions going on about the next steps, which include taking the state of California to Court.

Do you know what happens in Court?

There’s this very important thing called “Discovery.”

Discovery means witnesses are called and they get to tell their stories. In public. On the record. For everyone to see and hear.

Discovery is what has been denied in Vaccine Court. Parents of vaccine-injured children have been silenced. Until now.

The doors have just swung wide open.

It would have been far better for the pharmaceutical industry if Governor Brown had vetoed SB277.

And, guess what? That’s not the only good news…

As a result of what has just happened in California, more and more parents and activists around the globe are becoming informed about vaccine injuries. People who never even questioned are pausing and paying attention. If it weren’t for the fight in California, many people who are now questioning the safety and efficacy of vaccines would not have ever even given a glance. They are now wondering, “What is this all about? Maybe we should investigate a little further.”

As we all know, once a parent starts investigating, he or she is not going to stop. That can only work in favor of truth. Governor Brown’s emphasis on this aspect – expanded medical exemption – paves the way for legal challenges to SB277 if school systems and health departments refuse to accept a physician’s written medical exemption – FOR ANY REASON. This has been a huge problem for families seeking medical exemptions for their children, and not just in California.

I am not naive enough to believe this will work the way it is written.

I don’t think Governor Brown is, either.

One final word about what happened today…

I know many, and especially many of those in California, are grieving today. Some may be panicking. Many are no doubt being triggered by the recurring trauma they have endured as a result of vaccine-injury and repeated denial and threats (this is a big threat) by their government. I am genuinely sorry for what my California friends are feeling. You deserve to grieve. Your pain is real. Your fear is justified. Allow yourself to feel it. Honor those feelings and emotions so they do not cloud your judgement as you pick yourself up and prepare for the next leg of this journey. This is a MISSION and YOU have been chosen. Your work is going to end up saving not only your children, but all of our children, and ultimately, the future of humanity itself.

Without these challenges, and without your strength, your extraordinary care and concern, and your willingness to stand up for what is right and not back down, many who are now awake would still be ignorant of the danger that is heading for their own families.

If SB277 had been vetoed, things would have died down, not only in California, but in the rest of the country. That’s why this is happening. It is not time for things to die down.

This is just the beginning.

I hope you are all organizing in your own states. If not, get busy.

This is coming to you.”

There are many doctors who are joining us in our fight for freedom and transparency with vaccines. I encourage you to support their efforts. Here are a few suggestions:

Dr. Barbara Loe Fisher, President of the National Vaccine Information Center

Dr. Tenpenny

Vaccine info:
Health info:
Vaccine Library

Find doctors in your area who support educated parents and our freedom to choose:

We at the American Eagle Party believe the American people deserve to be educated, informed, and free to choose what is best for themselves and their families.

Please join us in our fight for truth and freedom.

Jennie Layne,

Membership Director

Obama’s Deadly Cold War Legacy

1-Russia - encircled by NATO The costs of this Cold War II will be vast, emptying out what’s left of the U.S. Treasury in a new arms race against Russia, assuming that the new East-West showdown doesn’t precipitate a nuclear war that could end all life on the planet. Already, the United States military has altered its national security policies to treat Russia as the principal foreign threat. In the up-is-down world that is now Official Washington, such extraordinary and profoundly dangerous statements draw only nodding approval from all the Important People. In part, that’s because President Obama has allowed so many false narratives to take hold regarding Russia, Iran and other nations that there is a Grimm’s Fairytale quality to it all. But the most serious false narrative today is the one about “Russian aggression.” Whatever one thinks of Russian President Vladimir Putin, he did not initiate the Ukraine crisis; he reacted to a provocation by neoconservatives in the U.S. government, especially Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs Victoria Nuland, who sought a “regime change” on Russia’s border. And, while there’s plenty of evidence to support the fact that the U.S. intervened in Ukraine, there is no evidence that Putin sought out this crisis or had any designs to recreate the Russian Empire, two key elements of the U.S. propaganda campaign. The truth is that by encouraging and instigating the violent Ukraine coup on Feb. 22, 2014, the Obama administration struck first.